How AI and Cloud Technology Are Reshaping Finance Leadership

Chief Financial Officers are adopting AI and cloud technology faster than any other C-suite executives, yet most struggle to demonstrate clear returns on these investments. The percentage of CFOs and finance leaders employing AI more than doubled from 34% in 2024 to 72% in 2025, according to Protiviti research. Meanwhile, 80% of CFOs plan to increase AI spending in coming years, driven by economic uncertainty and pressure to do more with less.

But here's the uncomfortable truth: while CFOs embrace these technologies at the strategic level, a massive disconnect exists with those actually operating finance systems. Recent data reveals a 32-percentage-point divide between CFOs and Financial Controllers on AI adoption. CFOs believe they've implemented AI, while controllers report their teams still export spreadsheets, fix data manually, and stitch together numbers before AI tools can even begin analysis.

Understanding this gap—and what separates successful AI implementations from expensive failures—matters for anyone trying to navigate the evolving role of finance leadership in technology-driven organizations.

The Pressure Cooker Environment Forcing CFO Transformation

CFOs face converging pressures that make digital transformation not just attractive but essential. The ongoing accountant talent shortage has made it increasingly difficult to attract and retain qualified professionals. Meanwhile, investor expectations continue escalating, demanding greater transparency, faster reporting cycles and more sophisticated analytics.

Seventy-two percent of financial executives agree that CFOs are tasked with doing more with less, according to Tipalti research. The same percentage indicated they're likely to implement AI and prioritize digital transformation to achieve business goals. Nearly two-thirds rate their organization's readiness for digital transformation as moderate or less—revealing that aspiration significantly outpaces capability.

A 2024 Deloitte survey found that 73% of finance leaders spend over half their time on repetitive tasks. This creates obvious opportunity for automation, yet also explains why AI adoption remains superficial in many organizations. When finance teams are buried in manual processes, they lack bandwidth to implement transformative technology properly.

The talent shortage amplifies these challenges. You can't hire your way out of repetitive work when qualified candidates don't exist at acceptable cost levels. Technology must fill gaps that human capital can't—but deploying that technology requires expertise and time that overwhelmed finance teams struggle to provide.

The Strategic Role Expansion Nobody Prepared CFOs For

Beyond operational pressures, the CFO role itself has fundamentally expanded. Over 60% of chief intelligence officers now report directly to CEOs, an increase of more than 10 percentage points since 2020. This reflects technology leaders' increased importance in setting AI strategy rather than simply enabling it.

CFOs must now understand technology trends powering change, recognize business value to evaluate and advise on investment, ask the right questions across the enterprise, keep close watch on data policy, and manage change in their own finance organizations. The role has evolved from financial steward to strategic driver of sustainable, financial and digital transformation.

Deloitte's Tech Trends 2025 report identifies disruptive forces requiring finance leaders' attention: the further evolution of AI, its increasing role in IT functions, sharper attention to hardware rather than software, and the need to balance investments in both foundational and emerging technologies. These aren't incremental changes—they're fundamental shifts in how finance organizations operate and contribute strategic value.

Yet most CFOs received no training for this expanded mandate. They climbed career ladders focused on accounting, compliance, reporting, and capital allocation—not technology evaluation, AI implementation, or digital transformation leadership. Now they're expected to make multi-million dollar technology bets while simultaneously running traditional finance operations under increased scrutiny.

Where AI Actually Works Versus Where It Fails

AI truly excels at the "presentation layer"—generating sophisticated board commentary, modeling complex scenarios, and feeding automated dashboards. This strategic value promises to free leadership time for higher-order decision-making. However, the view from the operational level tells a different story.

One Financial Controller noted that strategic commentary may look automated, but many operational finance staff still export spreadsheets, fix data manually, and stitch together numbers before AI tools can even begin analysis. The foundational, dirty work of finance—the data preparation—remains a persistent, manual slog.

Businesses using AI for financial automation are slashing operating costs by 22-25% and speeding up tasks by 30-40%, according to studies. Yet these gains concentrate in organizations that addressed foundational automation first. The core challenge isn't the technology itself but the lack of underlying process automation and data infrastructure that AI requires to function effectively.

Most prominent AI applications in finance are process automation (66%), financial forecasting (58%), and risk assessment and management (57%). However, even these implementations often deliver disappointing returns because they're layered atop manual processes rather than integrated into automated workflows.

The ROI Measurement Problem Killing AI Budgets

Only 45% of finance executives can quantify ROI from AI initiatives. Of those who can, a third report returns under 5%, while another quarter fall between 5% and 10%—well below the 20% threshold many planned for. Median reported ROI sits at just 10%, revealing significant gap between investment and realized value.

Roughly one in five finance functions report ROI of 20% or more from AI and GenAI investments. What sets these outperforming organizations apart are the implementation tactics they adopt and the use cases they prioritize. High-return teams focus relentlessly on quick wins over open-ended learning or continuous improvement, and that focus pays dividends.

The share of companies abandoning most AI projects jumped to 42% in 2025 from just 17% the prior year, often citing cost and unclear value as top reasons. Nearly half of business leaders identify proving generative AI's business value as the single biggest hurdle to adoption. The era of AI for AI's sake has ended—successful enterprises demand measurable value and know how to capture it.

Several factors make measuring AI ROI uniquely challenging. Initial lags or uncertainties mean benefits from financial forecasting may take months to manifest tangible value. Poor data quality and fragmented data impair measurement. Legacy systems aggravate problems further, leading to misconstrued outputs and inconsistent data standards.

The Implementation Gap Separating Winners from Losers

Out of more than 30 implementation tactics tested by BCG, ten stood out as most successful—including integrating AI into overall finance transformation, systematic tracking, developing clear data strategy, and focusing on quick wins. Organizations generating strong ROI make fundamentally different choices than those achieving mediocre results.

Veritas Capital's CFO Jason Donner successfully focused on generating operational workflow efficiencies by deploying AI tools for core back-office tasks, not just reporting. Specifically, they use technology to reconcile investor financial statements and process IRS tax reporting communications. This focus on automating high-volume, repetitive data processes directly addresses operational pain points and provides clear, immediate ROI.

Thoma Bravo CFO Amy Coleman Redenbaugh emphasized starting with AI governance framework rather than jumping straight to deployment. They piloted different technologies, appointed designated AI champions, and actively trained teams on use cases and prompt engineering. This disciplined, structured approach mitigates two common challenges CFOs cite as major barriers: unclear use cases and lack of internal expertise.

The mandate is clear: significant AI capital expenditure must translate into genuine enterprise value. Success requires looking beneath dashboards to demand internal audits of AI implementation, measuring success not by board report quality but by material reduction in manual processing time on the ground.

Cloud Technology as Foundation, Not Afterthought

While AI captures headlines, cloud infrastructure provides the foundation making AI implementation possible. Yet cloud adoption faces similar challenges—organizations rush to deploy cloud-based tools without modernizing underlying processes or data architecture.

AI is consuming digital budgets at significant rates compared to rest of the tech estate. Value creation is real but uneven, with CFOs, CIOs, and CTOs often pulling in different directions, potentially leaving enterprise value stranded in gaps. To avoid AI overreach that boosts hype but erodes resilience, leaders should focus on raising digital budgets to match ambition, measuring value beyond ROI, and aligning leadership incentives to enterprisewide outcomes.

Since 2023, the share of digital budgets devoted to monetization has grown from 18% to 20% on average—roughly $400 million for companies with significant technology spending. This represents growing recognition that technology investments must drive revenue, not just reduce costs.

However, budgets appear consolidating around AI while investment in foundational capabilities continues eroding. Out of 20 technology capabilities tracked, AI and generative AI were clear front-runners with 74% of surveyed organizations reporting investments—nearly 20 percentage points higher than next most popular areas including data management, cloud platforms, and enterprise resource planning technologies.

This creates concerning dynamics where organizations pile AI initiatives atop inadequate infrastructure, virtually guaranteeing disappointing outcomes. Cloud platforms, data management, and core systems require continued investment even as AI spending accelerates, yet budget pressures force tradeoffs that undermine both.

What CFOs Must Do Differently

The future of CFO automation will likely center on using advanced technology like AI and predictive analytics in conjunction with cloud-based enterprise platforms to permanently transform finance from back-office function to strategic business partner. Advanced capabilities like AI-driven forecasting will enable better cash flow predictions and scenario planning, ensuring operations are predictive and adaptive rather than reactive.

However, achieving this vision requires fundamental shifts in approach. CFOs must develop technology fluency and work with technology partners more constructively than historically they may have thought their role aligned, according to Deloitte's James Glover. The need to partner with technology practitioners and CIO/CTO organizations will be paramount to success—finance can only enable so much on its own.

Data security and integrity cannot be compromised as capabilities expand. Accounting teams must pivot to systems that protect sensitive financial information and don't share data with outside sources, introducing risk and uncertainty. With rampant consolidation happening among technology providers, aligning with stable, well-capitalized vendors who aren't at risk of being sold off or combined with unknown operators becomes paramount.

CFOs should focus on four proven strategies based on BCG's analysis: focus relentlessly on value by prioritizing quick wins; integrate AI into broader finance transformation rather than treating it as standalone initiative; develop robust measurement frameworks tracking both efficiency gains and strategic impacts; and invest in change management ensuring teams understand and effectively use new capabilities.

The Knowledge Gap Determining Success

Most CFOs lack frameworks for evaluating AI and cloud technologies, understanding implementation challenges, or determining which structural factors predict success versus failure. This knowledge gap explains why adoption significantly outpaces value realization despite aggressive spending.

Seventy-nine percent of CFOs indicate AI budgets will increase in 2025, while 94% believe generative AI can strongly benefit at least one activity area within finance organization in next 12 months. Yet 71% are not currently using generative AI in their finance and accounting function, held back by inability to find solutions meeting their needs or uncertainty about where to start.

Quality education covering AI capabilities, cloud infrastructure, implementation best practices, ROI measurement, and change management creates foundation for successfully deploying these technologies. Understanding not just what technologies can do but how to evaluate vendors, structure pilots, measure results, and scale successful implementations separates CFOs who drive transformation from those who waste budgets on disappointing tools.

The CFO role has fundamentally transformed. Those who develop technology fluency, partner effectively with IT organizations, focus on value rather than hype, and build teams capable of leveraging new capabilities will lead organizations to new efficiency, insight and growth levels. Those who view technology as someone else's problem or fail to bridge the gap between strategic vision and operational reality will find themselves increasingly irrelevant in finance leadership conversations.

Whether you're a current CFO navigating these changes, an aspiring finance leader preparing for expanded responsibilities, or an entrepreneur building finance technology solutions, understanding these dynamics determines success in the AI-driven finance function emerging today.

Educational content only. Technology investments carry risks including implementation challenges and uncertain returns. Organizations should conduct thorough evaluation and consult experts before major technology commitments.

More News